“A city is what it is because its citizens are what they are.” (PLATO)

Stacks Image 1008

GOTHENBURG (rank 38) - Sweden

About the data

Methodology

How to read these results

The Happy City Index is an independent comparative research project based on a structured methodology and multi-source data assessment. The results presented here are provided for informational and benchmarking purposes only and should not be treated as a definitive or exhaustive statement of fact.

  • Scores compare each city with the average across all cities in the Index.
  • For important decisions, verify relevant data with official sources.
Read the published methodology →

Spotted a mistake?

Help us improve the Index

We have made every effort to ensure reliable and comparable data. Still, errors may occur. If you notice something that should be corrected, let us know.

By doing so, you can also join us as a one-time contributor and become part of our global community of researchers.

  • 1 · Report
  • 2 · We verify
  • 3 · Index improves
Report a correction →

Source: Institute for Quality of Life, Happy City Index 2026.

Happy City Index 2026 · City profile

Gothenburg against the Index average

Results for all 64 indicators, grouped into six themes: citizens, governance, environment, economy, health and mobility.

Total score6427
CategoryGold
Above the average32/51
Policies in place12/13

Results by theme

Share of indicators in each theme where Gothenburg scores above the average or has the policy in place.

Citizens90%Governance59%Environment86%Economy40%Health75%Mobility75%50%

All 64 indicators at a glance

One square per indicator, ordered by theme. Hover for details.

32 above average12 policies in place17 below avg. / missing3 neutral
9of 10
Citizens
10of 17
Governance
6of 7
Environment
4of 10
Economy
9of 12
Health
6of 8
Mobility

01Selected results

GovernanceTurnout in the last local elections
76.5%
Index average: 49.8%
CitizensUrban innovation ecosystem potential
160
Index average: 86
MobilityPublic transport trips per resident a year
241
Index average: 194
CitizensResidents who speak a foreign language
76%
Index average: 34%
EnvironmentGreen mobility share
58%
Index average: 45%
EconomyPaid parental leave at 50%+ of salary
56
Index average: 24
GovernanceNet internal migration per 1,000 residents
+9.1
Index average: +3.6
EnvironmentAnnual average PM2.5 concentration
7.0
Index average: 11.9
MobilityRoad traffic accidents per 1,000 residents
3.2
Index average: 8.1
GothenburgIndex average

02Largest differences from the average

Ahead of the average

  • GDP Growth (%)
    75× avg1.50% vs 0.02%
  • Net Internal Migration Rate per 1,000 Population
    2.5× avg9.10 vs 3.58
  • Paid Parental Leave Weeks at 50% or More of Salary
    2.3× avg56 vs 24.21
  • Population Able to Communicate in a Foreign Language (%)
    2.2× avg76.2% vs 34.14%
  • Cost of Higher Education Compared to Average Annual Salary
    100% lower0% vs 0.07%
  • Urban Innovation Ecosystem Potential
    +86%159.92 vs 86.02
  • Homeless People per 10,000 Residents
    66% lower1.77 vs 5.27
  • Road Traffic Accidents per 1,000 Residents
    61% lower3.18 vs 8.13

Behind the average

  • Parks per km²
    −92%0.09 vs 1.09
  • Patents per 100,000 Inhabitants
    −82%32.24 vs 178.84
  • Housing Affordability Ratio
    68% higher8.62 vs 5.12
  • Percentage Deviation in Earnings Relative to the National Average
    −67%14% vs 43.01%
  • Green Space per Capita
    −57%31.06 vs 72.57
  • Cultural Institutions per 100,000 Residents
    −48%4.2 vs 8.15
  • Libraries per 10 km²
    −44%0.65 vs 1.16
  • Businesses per 1,000 Residents
    −27%100.93 vs 138.18
  • Recycling Rate (%)
    −16%37% vs 44.29%

03All indicators

GothenburgOverall averageAbove averageBelow average

Citizens

9 above avg.0 below avg.10 indicators
Urban Innovation Ecosystem Potential
GOT159.92
AVG86.02
Above average
School Density
GOT0.43
AVG0.71
Below average
Higher Education Accessibility
In place
Presence of a Globally Ranked Higher Education Institution
GOT151
AVG276.16
Above average
Cost of Higher Education Compared to Average Annual Salary
GOT0%
AVG0.07%
Above average
Residents with a Master's Degree (%)
GOT13.1%
AVG12.40%
Above average
Population Able to Communicate in a Foreign Language (%)
GOT76.2%
AVG34.14%
Above average
Use of Electronic Banking Services (%)
GOT83.07%
AVG79.27%
Above average
Population Aged 65+ Benefiting from Municipal Home Care (%)
GOT13.6%
AVG10.51%
Above average
Homeless People per 10,000 Residents
GOT1.77
AVG5.27
Above average

Governance

10 above avg.5 below avg.17 indicators
Availability of City Website
GOT4
AVG2.11
Above average
Net Internal Migration Rate per 1,000 Population
GOT9.10
AVG3.58
Above average
Pupils per School Building
GOT219.84
AVG380.04
Below average
Employment in Creative Industries (%)
GOT6.2%
AVG4.62%
Above average
Housing Affordability Ratio
GOT8.62
AVG5.12
Below average
Housing Affordability Ratio (Rent)
GOT33%
AVG32.32%
Below average
Cultural Institutions per 100,000 Residents
GOT4.2
AVG8.15
Below average
Libraries per 10 km²
GOT0.65
AVG1.16
Below average
Voter Turnout in the Last Local Elections (%)
GOT76.49%
AVG49.79%
Above average
Open Data Portal Availability
In place
Datasets Available in Machine-Readable Formats
In place
Fault Reporting System via Website or Mobile App
In place
Electronic Payments for Municipal Services
In place
Online Appointment Booking with City Hall
Not in place
Up-to-Date Official Development Strategy
In place
Key Elements Included in the Strategy
GOT5
AVG4.5
Above average
AI Awareness in City Strategies
In place

Environment

6 above avg.1 below avg.7 indicators
Annual Average PM2.5 Concentration
GOT7.00
AVG11.86
Above average
Green Mobility Share (%)
GOT58.0%
AVG45.25%
Above average
Waste Generated per Resident
GOT0.42
AVG0.51
Above average
Population Served by Sewage Treatment Facilities (%)
GOT100%
AVG95.46%
Above average
Recycling Rate (%)
GOT37%
AVG44.29%
Below average
Landfill Waste Burden
GOT0.265
AVG0.28
Above average
Biodiversity Protection Strategy
In place

Economy

4 above avg.6 below avg.10 indicators
GDP per Capita
GOT42,957 GBP
AVG36,208 GBP
Above average
GDP Growth (%)
GOT1.50%
AVG0.02%
Above average
Patents per 100,000 Inhabitants
GOT32.24
AVG178.84
Below average
Businesses per 1,000 Residents
GOT100.93
AVG138.18
Below average
City Fiscal Power Index
GOT22.70%
AVG25.56%
Below average
Annual Average Unemployment Rate
GOT6.4%
AVG5.58%
Below average
Annual Average Youth Unemployment Rate
GOT14%
AVG12.44%
Below average
Youth Unemployment Ratio
GOT2.2
AVG2.46
Above average
Percentage Deviation in Earnings Relative to the National Average
GOT14%
AVG43.01%
Below average
Paid Parental Leave Weeks at 50% or More of Salary
GOT56
AVG24.21
Above average

Health

9 above avg.3 below avg.12 indicators
Psychiatrists per 100,000 Inhabitants
GOT23.20
AVG16.38
Above average
Mental Health or Well-Being Strategy
In place
Strategy to Prevent and Address Hate Speech or Cyberbullying
In place
Licensed Medical Doctors Practising in the City (FTE)
GOT4.66
AVG5.18
Below average
Population Covered by Medical Insurance (%)
GOT100%
AVG97.69%
Above average
Intentional Homicides per 100,000 Residents
GOT13.98
AVG20.62
Above average
Adults Classified as Overweight or Obese (%)
GOT50.7%
AVG52.29%
Above average
Parks per km²
GOT0.09
AVG1.09
Below average
Green Space per Capita
GOT31.06
AVG72.57
Below average
Average Weekly Working Hours
GOT39.5
AVG40.52
Above average
Average Number of Paid Vacation Days
GOT25
AVG21.51
Above average
Life Expectancy at Birth
GOT83.05
AVG81.26
Above average

Mobility

6 above avg.2 below avg.8 indicators
Accessibility of Electronic Payment Systems in Transport
GOT3
AVG2.51
Above average
Distance to the Nearest International Airport
GOT20
AVG21.44
Above average
Access Modes to the Nearest Airport
GOT3.00
AVG3.17
Below average
Public Transport Ridership per Capita
GOT241.10
AVG193.80
Above average
Accessible Public Transport Fleet (%)
GOT85%
AVG91.18%
Below average
Road Traffic Accidents per 1,000 Residents
GOT3.18
AVG8.13
Above average
Open Public Transport Data Availability
In place
Integrated Journey Planner Availability
In place

Note: bars are scaled separately for each indicator. For indicators where a lower value is preferable, such as unemployment or PM2.5, a lower result is counted as above average. Differences in section 02 are relative to the Index average; bars are capped at 150%.
Source: Institute for Quality of Life, Happy City Index 2026.

We use cookies on all our websites to gather anonymous data to improve your experience of our websites and serve relevant ads that may be of interest to you. Please refer to the Privacy Policy to find out more. By continuing, scrolling the page or clicking a link, you agree to the use of cookies.